Member-only story
6 Must Know Agentic Workflow Design Patterns (and Their Key Trade-Offs)
A guide to agentic workflows that balance performance, complexity, and reliability
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76388/763883cbb06a28180f7eb8ab6e6988865e8b210b" alt=""
AI-driven apps rely on large language models (LLMs) to tackle tasks once limited to specialized rule-based systems. As these LLM-based apps become “agents” — independently choosing their steps or calling external tools — they can quickly become unreliable or inefficient.
Picture current computer systems as well-planned hiking trails: each turn and signpost is fixed, so you always know the path. Now imagine handing a map to a savvy hiker who decides where to go at each fork. That’s what LLM-based “agents” do: they can plan their routes and use different tools.
We need strong patterns that go beyond Retrieval Augmented Generation(RAG), and that also tame the agents' “autonomous” behavior to get consistent results.
In this article, you will learn about various such patterns and their advantages and disadvantages, which will help you decide which pattern to use and when.